For those of you who think FBI Director Comey
was the fulcrum of this investigation making all the decisions, inputs, or judgments,
let’s look at a pattern of interference in investigations by President Obama.
He is a lawyer and previously (as he admitted in his autobiography) a criminal
so he understands the nuances of both the legal system and the media; which he
controls rather deftly. In fact, he uses the media to send messages to his DOJ
that he can’t send via e-mail, phone, face-to-face, etc. Think I am off on a conspiracy
theory or tangent? Keep reading.
Remember this
from the Washington Post article 10 May 2013, “The Internal
Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or
“patriot” in their names, confirming long-standing accusations by some
conservatives that their applications for tax-exempt status were being
improperly delayed and scrutinized.” After his IRS admitted to
targeting conservative groups to stop them from receiving tax breaks like every
other 501(c)4, he was potentially in deep trouble for using the US government
as a weapon against his political enemies; until he figured a way out of it. He
went on TV and referring to the IRS said this, during a 2014 Super Bowl
interview with Bill O’Reilly:
“What happened
here was that you've got a 501(c)4 law people think is confusing. The folks did
not know how to implement because it basically says –…….There was some
bone-headed decisions……Not even mass corruption. Not even a smidgeon of
corruption.”
After the investigation, the DOJ released its findings in Oct 2015
and concluded:
"substantial evidence of mismanagement, poor judgment and
institutional inertia leading to the belief by many tax-exempt applicants that
the IRS targeted them based on their political viewpoints. But poor management
is not a crime,"
It might not seem like much, but when the President of the United
States goes on television and comments on ongoing investigations, it has an
affect whether intended or not. Personally, I think his minions are aware of
this practice in the (D) party and as such they respond accordingly. Remember a
true liberal’s objective is not to better this country, it is to change this
country in spite of facts, evidence and worldwide examples that prove America
is the most benevolent and generous country in the history of mankind. Don’t
believe me, just ask one; they will immediately start pointing the finger at
someone else’s shortcomings (usually a conservative or a gun) a key indication
you are hitting the mark. Now as this summer’s presidential race starting
heating up, Sec Clinton’s indiscretions (Benghazi, E-mail servers, Clinton
Foundation) were coming to a head, as at least two of the investigations appeared
to be on a collision course with her nomination. Once again, Pres Obama to the
rescue.
On 10 Apr
2016 Pres Obama, when asked about the Sec Clinton e-mail scandal said, “She
would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy…..“I continue to
believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security,” In
other words, regardless of the impact of her use of a private server, she
wasn’t actually trying to endanger Americans or do anything wrong. Pres Obama
also said, “I guarantee that there is no political influence in any
investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this
case, but in any case, Full stop.”
Sound familiar? Once again President Obama not only weighs in,
when he should remain mute, but he signals the escape route to his minions. All
while denying any political influence vehemently; as if none of the people
involved watch the news or read reports.
After the investigation,
the FBI released its findings just last week and FBI Dir Comey said:
"there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their
handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Which for the
uninitiated to the world of security clearances, is a death knell for your
access to classified and a starting gun on the criminal case to punish you.
However, in this case Dir Comey concluded that because- “I don’t think she is
particularly sophisticated about classified information”, she shouldn’t be
prosecuted. Freeing her from the saddle of indictment and setting her on her
way to being president. Make no mistake, since Pres Obama’s interview message
on 10 Apr 2016, the wheels were set in motion. What happened as a result?
1-secretive Bill Clinton meeting with AG Lynch
2-secretive “interview” with Sec Clinton (unrecorded and not under
oath according to reports)
3-Sec Clinton openly bribes AG Lynch telling her she will be her
first AG in the NY Times
4-“Unscheduled” announcement of investigation results
5-Pres Obama campaigns with Sec Clinton (they left for NC on AF 1
as scheduled, wink wink)
His basic scheme (and believe me there are plenty of examples) is
to deny any “intent” to do wrong, explain away actions by “incompetence”, “poor
judgment”, or “mis-management”. Here’s a list of some prominent scandals, all
of which were explained away by the aforementioned excuses:
1-IRS targeting conservatives
2-Benghazi
3-Spying on
the Associated Press
4-Monitoring
James Rosen’s e-mail and phones
5-Fast and
Furious
6-The Pigford Scandal
7-VA debacle
Ladies and gentlemen this
isn’t an accident, this is how Pres Obama has conducted himself from his first
day in office until today. He does what he wants and if you don’t like it you’re
a racist, if he gets caught it only happened because someone "acted stupidly". Let’s give
him and his administration (including Sec Clinton) the benefit of all their
explanations being actually truthful (*cough cough). I would like you to ask yourself
and your liberal friends; why would anyone in this country vote for four more years of outright corruption
at worst and complete incompetence at BEST?
#MakeAmericaGreatAgain
No comments:
Post a Comment