Friday, July 8, 2016

#CrookedHillary’s Email Escape Route

   For those of you who think FBI Director Comey was the fulcrum of this investigation making all the decisions, inputs, or judgments, let’s look at a pattern of interference in investigations by President Obama. He is a lawyer and previously (as he admitted in his autobiography) a criminal so he understands the nuances of both the legal system and the media; which he controls rather deftly. In fact, he uses the media to send messages to his DOJ that he can’t send via e-mail, phone, face-to-face, etc. Think I am off on a conspiracy theory or tangent? Keep reading.

Remember this from the Washington Post article 10 May 2013, “The Internal Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, confirming long-standing accusations by some conservatives that their applications for tax-exempt status were being improperly delayed and scrutinized.” After his IRS admitted to targeting conservative groups to stop them from receiving tax breaks like every other 501(c)4, he was potentially in deep trouble for using the US government as a weapon against his political enemies; until he figured a way out of it. He went on TV and referring to the IRS said this, during a 2014 Super Bowl interview with Bill O’Reilly:

What happened here was that you've got a 501(c)4 law people think is confusing. The folks did not know how to implement because it basically says –…….There was some bone-headed decisions……Not even mass corruption. Not even a smidgeon of corruption.”

After the investigation, the DOJ released its findings in Oct 2015 and concluded:

"substantial evidence of mismanagement, poor judgment and institutional inertia leading to the belief by many tax-exempt applicants that the IRS targeted them based on their political viewpoints. But poor management is not a crime,"

It might not seem like much, but when the President of the United States goes on television and comments on ongoing investigations, it has an affect whether intended or not. Personally, I think his minions are aware of this practice in the (D) party and as such they respond accordingly. Remember a true liberal’s objective is not to better this country, it is to change this country in spite of facts, evidence and worldwide examples that prove America is the most benevolent and generous country in the history of mankind. Don’t believe me, just ask one; they will immediately start pointing the finger at someone else’s shortcomings (usually a conservative or a gun) a key indication you are hitting the mark. Now as this summer’s presidential race starting heating up, Sec Clinton’s indiscretions (Benghazi, E-mail servers, Clinton Foundation) were coming to a head, as at least two of the investigations appeared to be on a collision course with her nomination. Once again, Pres Obama to the rescue.

On 10 Apr 2016 Pres Obama, when asked about the Sec Clinton e-mail scandal said, “She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy…..“I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security,” In other words, regardless of the impact of her use of a private server, she wasn’t actually trying to endanger Americans or do anything wrong. Pres Obama also said, “I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case, Full stop.”

Sound familiar? Once again President Obama not only weighs in, when he should remain mute, but he signals the escape route to his minions. All while denying any political influence vehemently; as if none of the people involved watch the news or read reports.

 After the investigation, the FBI released its findings just last week and FBI Dir Comey said:

"there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Which for the uninitiated to the world of security clearances, is a death knell for your access to classified and a starting gun on the criminal case to punish you. However, in this case Dir Comey concluded that because- “I don’t think she is particularly sophisticated about classified information”, she shouldn’t be prosecuted. Freeing her from the saddle of indictment and setting her on her way to being president. Make no mistake, since Pres Obama’s interview message on 10 Apr 2016, the wheels were set in motion. What happened as a result?

1-secretive Bill Clinton meeting with AG Lynch
2-secretive “interview” with Sec Clinton (unrecorded and not under oath according to reports)
3-Sec Clinton openly bribes AG Lynch telling her she will be her first AG in the NY Times
4-“Unscheduled” announcement of investigation results
5-Pres Obama campaigns with Sec Clinton (they left for NC on AF 1 as scheduled, wink wink)

His basic scheme (and believe me there are plenty of examples) is to deny any “intent” to do wrong, explain away actions by “incompetence”, “poor judgment”, or “mis-management”. Here’s a list of some prominent scandals, all of which were explained away by the aforementioned excuses:

1-IRS targeting conservatives
3-Spying on the Associated Press
4-Monitoring James Rosen’s e-mail and phones
5-Fast and Furious
6-The Pigford Scandal
7-VA debacle

   Ladies and gentlemen this isn’t an accident, this is how Pres Obama has conducted himself from his first day in office until today. He does what he wants and if you don’t like it you’re a racist, if he gets caught it only happened because someone "acted stupidly". Let’s give him and his administration (including Sec Clinton) the benefit of all their explanations being actually truthful (*cough cough). I would like you to ask yourself and your liberal friends; why would anyone in this country vote for four more years of outright corruption at worst and complete incompetence at BEST?


Sunday, May 17, 2015

What I Want to Hear From (R) Candidates

    I think we can all agree, we are sick and tired of the non-stop nit picking back and forth between the media and Republican candidates (or potential candidates) for president. The media plays gotcha with standard liberal memes like; “do you support equal pay for women?”, “are you pro-choice?”, “do you support increased spending on infrastructure?”, and of course “knowing what we know now, would you have gone into Iraq like Dubya did?”.  In response, the (R) candidates pander a bit to liberals and then point out Sec Clinton’s inadequacy for the office of president. Simply put the (R)s are afraid of the media and the inevitable onslaught of twitter sniping and blog posting by liberal scoundrels across the country. I would really like to see the (R)s ask the media a question or two. Perhaps they could ask, “at what point does the federal government stop being responsible for everything in your life?” or “When did we, as Americans, relinquish our desire for liberty and the idea self-reliance?”. The non-stop drip drip drip of liberal complaints that include unfair this, and discrimination that; are eroding our personal liberty and submerging our self-reliant American culture and it is destructive.
   The real problem with liberal causes and liberals generally is there is no end to their demands. There will never be enough federal spending and there will never be enough equality (read wealth redistribution).  Let’s take a peek at the “equal pay” issue. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 was the first bill signed into law by President Obama. Based on the name and coverage in the news, one might think the law made it illegal to pay women less than men for the same job. However, unequal pay for women was made illegal in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The new act simply states that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new paycheck affected by that discriminatory action, overturning a US Supreme Court decision stating the statute of limitations for presenting an equal-pay lawsuit begins on the date that the employer makes the initial discriminatory wage decision, not at the date of the most recent paycheck. The deceptive advertisement of the law as an “equal pay for equal work”  bill is gobbled up by the liberal media and fed to the American populace, that generally can’t pay attention long enough to read a two page blog post, much less understand it or read the actual legislation. It’s the same reason we think Hollywood is full of awesome people or we don’t give enough money to education; because liberals tell us so. Never mind the facts (read “Detroit Rock City!”) and certainly don’t expect the liberal media to iron out the truth for you; they are all in for liberal causes (#Stephanopoulos) and perpetuating lies (#BrianWilliams), when it suits their needs.
   In an article published by Lilly Ledbetter and Linda D. Hallman by Forbes magazine in 2014 the opening paragraph states; “Five years after the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was signed into law, American women are almost no closer to receiving equal pay for equal work.” Set aside the ambiguous language (“almost no closer”, really?) and think about the statement intimating that somehow even after they got what they wanted (notice the author’s name, yes it’s her namesake legislation); women aren’t getting paid the same as men for the same work. Need I remind you that it has been illegal since 1964? The machine liberals built to force feed our country a pointless piece of legislation, got what it wanted, but somehow can’t accept victory. Why you ask? It’s simple; the people who made money off this effort (mostly big (D) political operatives) want to keep the gravy train rolling. Keep an eye out and watch how they turn this effort toward the next liberal cause. It’s a lot more fun tweeting your outrage and organizing your liberal friends for a protest between joints, than it ever will be going to work. I know, because if I was making money off this blog I would do it full time, sans the weed of course.
   (R)s will face the same old media for the next year plus; itching to catch them saying something like; “I have binders filled with woman” or “47% of America won’t vote for me”. Their intent is to demonize the rascally Republicans who “hate woman and want poor people to die”; at least according to them. Republicans need to get used to it, expect it, stop whining about it and stiffen their upper lips. Figure out how to respond to this mindless drivel before you are confronted with it; or you will lose in 2016.